Your Hindi-English classes and meetings as notes you can search and ask — hearlog vs Notta

Where hearlog is different

Hindi-English mixing written the way people actually speak it — "kal ka lecture" stays as said, not forced into one language.

Notta's own site describes its meeting-bot options as "a bot can join the call, or you record on your device"; hearlog never joins a call — you record in the room or upload, which also works for in-person classes, hearings and phone calls.

One question across a folder of recordings (Pro), with the recording each answer came from.

Priced in rupees: free gives 300 minutes a month; Pro is ₹299/month or ₹2,990/year and adds one question across a folder, 2-hour files, 10 files at once and unlimited transcription (fair use).

Example: a term of lectures, one question

A law student keeps five recorded polity classes in a "Polity" folder. Before the test she asks the folder (Pro): "What did sir say about Article 21, and in which class?"

Example answer: "Article 21 came up twice — the right to life and personal liberty, with Maneka Gandhi as the key case (Source: Polity lecture 4), and the right to privacy after Puttaswamy (Source: Polity lecture 7)." Then she taps "Make 20 practice questions".

(An illustration of how the app works, not a real customer.)

Where Notta may suit you better

Notta lists 58 languages (monolingual transcription) on its own site. If you need a language outside hearlog's 50+, check their list.

If you want a bot to join and record your online calls, Notta offers that as an option; hearlog does not.

Notta's own site lists Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Kannada and Gujarati — so for a single Indian language, both can transcribe it. Choose hearlog for Hindi-English mixing written as spoken, no bot in your calls, in-person recordings, and one question across a folder (Pro).